In-house patch created for CCID data frame error handling issue seen on Solaris.

The data the CCID frame says to contain will only be evaluated to see if we 
have less data, if so then report it as an error condition. 

--- ccid-1.4.20/src/commands.c	2016-05-17 10:28:40.587856908 -0400
+++ ccid-1.4.20/src/commands.c	2016-05-17 10:04:27.530080977 -0400
@@ -1493,6 +1493,8 @@
 	length = sizeof(cmd);
 	ret = ReadPort(reader_index, &length, cmd);
 
+        DEBUG_CRITICAL2("LENGTH 1 is: %d ", length);
+
 	/* restore the original value of read timeout */
 	ccid_descriptor -> readTimeout = old_timeout;
 	CHECK_STATUS(ret)
@@ -1543,12 +1545,21 @@
 		DEBUG_COMM2("New timeout: %d ms", ccid_descriptor -> readTimeout);
 		goto time_request;
 	}
-
-	/* we have read less (or more) data than the CCID frame says to contain */
-	if (length-10 != dw2i(cmd, 1))
+        /****************************************************************************
+	  * we have read less (or more) data than the CCID frame says to contain       
+         * XXX - Change from original FOSS if test logic of "!=" due to line 1493     
+         *       'length' getting assigned a value of 65636 and 'cmd' appears to be     
+         *       evaluated and returned from 'sizeof' as an unsigned int, therefore         
+         *       (65536 -10) will never equal the data the CCID frame says to contain 
+         *       so, only evaluate to see if we have less data as an error condition. 
+         ****************************************************************************/
+       if (length-10 < dw2i(cmd, 1))
 	{
 		DEBUG_CRITICAL3("Can't read all data (%d out of %d expected)",
 			length-10, dw2i(cmd, 1));
+
+                DEBUG_CRITICAL2("LENGTH 2 is: %d ", length);
+
 		return_value = IFD_COMMUNICATION_ERROR;
 	}